I would first like to call attention to my nuanced, incredibly clever post title. Layers and layers of meaning.
Now, to the prologue. I've heard it said that an author is a composite of his characters. Or maybe I just made that up moments ago; at any rate, doesn't it sound about right? Certainly, in the case of Mosquitoes, it holds up based on what I've read thus far. As I have discerned from our biographical recapitulation, Faulkner seems to be equal parts Gordon, Talliaferro, and Fairchild; Fairchild, of course, because he is an author. As the Semitic gentleman (Julius) states, there is - or was - a certain conception that writers are not tantamount to artists. Faulkner is also Gordon, then, because he seems to persist in his career at transcending the glass ceiling separating writers from artists. We have observed this less artfully (pun probably intended) in Faulkner's early published poetry, and we observe it more subtly in this prologue; Fairchild, due in part to his grasp and command of language, is quite personable but still knows his way around self-important busybodies like Hooper. In contrast, Gordon is perceptibly exasperated and aloof even among his flatterers; observe the drop in temperature from the street exchange between Talliaferro and Mrs. Maurier to their ensuing brief visit with Gordon in his studio.
Then, of course, there is Talliaferro. In the brief exposition provided, the main gist seems to be that he prefers to obscure his Alabama roots, unremarkable life, and even his backwoods surname, in the interest of perpetuating the popular perception of his personality. In this light, the fact that Patricia calls him Tarver as they part - a name she should have no way of knowing - is quite interesting; hopefully it is explained later. Talliaferro (nee Tarver) seems rather effeminate; his preoccupation with his clothing, his obsequiousness and deference, even his assumption of a new last name (traditionally the lot of a newly married woman). Sort of Faulkneresque, I think, both in his dandyhood and his desire to define himself without actually having done much.
I'll leave it to someone else to comment about Gordon v. Patricia. Can't wait to get them on a boat together. Mmm, mmm, mmm.
Lastly, let's talk about everyone itching, slapping, and scratching. Hey, must be the titular mosquitoes. They are pervasive, and they chiefly strike at Talliaferro, near the beginning of the prologue, and at Patricia, near its end. Whether their choice of victim is anything other than coincidence remains to be seen, but I will comment that the character most reminiscent of a mosquito thus far is Mrs. Maurier. She is, after all, a mindless thing that flits about vapidly and draws vitality from the lives of others; this is true of her furtive need to understand art (or appear to) and also of her need to surround herself with men. As her frank assessment of Talliaferro reveals, any man will do. Will this turn out to be a critique of the relationship between artist, patron, and appreciator, likening one of these groups to a parasitic insect? Stay tuned.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What I noticed about the mosquitoes is that they tend to attack the older characters in the novel: Mr. Talliaferro, Mrs. Maurier. While I am not entirely sure why this is the case, the brief, poetic description of mosquitoes prior to the prologue seems to give an idea of the mosquito representing a kind of spitefulness or doom: "toward the moon of decay and death...cunning as pawnbrokers..." In the prologue itself there is a stark contrast between the young characters and the old, and Faulkner makes it clear that the older characters can feel this disparity. So I am thinking that the mosquito is somehow related to a twistedness or ugliness that comes with old age. Why exactly the mosquito would be used for this, I don't know! As for one group being a parasitic insect, that is interesting too. The discussion between the artists toward the end IS about how best they can take advantage of Mrs. Maurier, and those like her...
ReplyDeleteNever mind, apparently the niece gets bugged by the bugs as well.
ReplyDeleteIn that case, I've just got no clue.
Ira, I like the assertion that an author is a composite of his characters. I don't know if this is always the case, but it certainly appears to pervade Faulkner's novels. I saw equal parts of Faulkner in Mahon, Gilligan, and the young one (I forget his name, much as Mrs. Powers does...) in Solider's Pay. I would have to read more of Mosquitoes to see how much of Faulkner is manifested in its cast, but from your points and what I know of the rest of the book, it seems that Faulkner has written himself into the pages again. For example, Talliafero, as you mention, changes his name from Tarver, just as Faulkner changed his name by adding the 'u.' Further along in the novel there appears a lesbian poet whose poems Faulkner later publishes under his own name. These two things seem to strengthen your case that Faulkner based his characters off himself, whether consciously or unconsciously.
ReplyDelete